Targeted Financial Conditions Indices (TFCI): why average financial conditions miss what matters most

Miguel Herculano, Santiago Montoya-Blandon and Jorge Pinheiro

Financial conditions indices are widely used by central banks and policymakers, including in the UK, to summarise and monitor in real-time the state of financial conditions in an economy. But most indices focus on what happens to average conditions, rather than the risks policymakers are often most concerned about – such as sharp downturns in economic activity or surges in inflation. We develop novel targeted financial conditions indices (TFCIs), using US data, that focus directly on measuring and forecasting these risks. Instead of asking which financial variables move together on average, the approach identifies which ones matter for specific outcomes. We show that different risks are linked to different financial factors – and that focusing on these can improve the forecasting performance of these key macroeconomic targets.

Continue reading “Targeted Financial Conditions Indices (TFCI): why average financial conditions miss what matters most”

Does higher productivity create inflationary or disinflationary pressure?

Ludovica Ambrosino, Jenny Chan and Silvana Tenreyro

Recent technological advances raise an important question for policymakers: will higher productivity lead to disinflationary or inflationary pressure? A coming wave of AI-driven productivity growth is often described as a disinflationary tailwind that would allow central banks to hold interest rates lower without reigniting inflationary pressures. Yet faster productivity growth can just as plausibly call for higher, not lower, interest rates. By raising expected future income and the returns to investment, it stimulates consumption and investment today, pushing up the natural rate of interest. Neither view is entirely wrong and our model reconciles the two by showing that the answer depends on the timing, permanence, and sectoral origin of the productivity shock.

Continue reading “Does higher productivity create inflationary or disinflationary pressure?”

A summary measure for UK households’ resilience

Vania Esady and Stephen Burgess

A summary measure for UK households’ resilience

High levels of household debt have been shown to amplify recessions. For example, in the global financial crisis (GFC), UK households with more debt tended to cut back their spending disproportionately, amplifying aggregate demand effects and potentially making the recession worse. High levels of household (and corporate) debt can pose risks to the UK financial system through two main channels: lender resilience and borrower resilience. However, monitoring households’ resilience to future shocks is not an easy task. In this post we construct some new summary measures of borrower resilience. We show that increases in debt-servicing costs or in the flow of credit to households could make households less resilient overall.

Continue reading “A summary measure for UK households’ resilience”

Growth-at-Risk for macroprudential policy stance assessment: a survey

Tihana Škrinjarić

How effective is macroprudential policy and how should policymakers measure its stance? My recent paper surveys the literature on the topic of Growth-at-Risk (GaR), which has been developed as a methodology to provide answers to these questions by relating the effects of macroprudential policy tools to real-economy dynamics. While the results are mixed, the consensus finds a positive impact from macroprudential policy tightening during the expansion of the financial cycle. Policy loosening reduces the potential GDP losses during contractions, with the effects being more prominent in the medium term. Several challenges within this framework still exist. Resolving these would lead to a more accurate evaluation of macroprudential policy effectiveness. Finally, I discuss GaR policy applications.

Continue reading “Growth-at-Risk for macroprudential policy stance assessment: a survey”