The right tools for the job? How effectively can central banks support the transition to net zero?

Utkarsh Somaiya, Caspar Siegert and Benjamin Kingsmore

Climate change creates material economic and financial risks which central banks need to understand to ensure monetary and financial stability. Their interest in climate change has therefore skyrocketed, with almost one third of central bank speeches in 2023 referencing climate change. Central banks are typically responsible for ensuring monetary and financial stability; these macroeconomic conditions are essential to support an orderly transition to net zero. But central banks are often urged to play a more active role and provide targeted support for the transition. Rather than discussing whether this is consistent with their legal mandates, we ask a more pragmatic question: do central banks have the right tools for this job? We argue that some commonly discussed tools may not be very effective.

Continue reading →

Same firms, different footprints: making sense of financed emissions

Lewis Holden

Over 95% of banks’ emissions are ‘financed emissions’. These are indirect emissions from households and businesses who banks lend to or invest in (banks’ asset exposures). Banks disclose these in line with regulations designed to help markets understand their exposure to climate-related risks and their impact on the climate. But emissions disclosures vary drastically between different banks with similar business models. Data quality and availability is cited as the key reason for this. In this post, I demonstrate that variations in financed emissions estimates are explained by the extent of banking activities and asset exposures rather than data quality and availability. For example, whether estimates capture a subset of loan exposures or wider banking activities such as bond underwriting.

Continue reading →

Adaptation is to mitigation what Robin is to Batman

Jenny Clark and Theresa Löber

The UK’s climate continues to change, getting wetter and warmer, with extremes becoming ever more pronounced. Even if we limit global warming to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels, experts warn that we’ll see the number and severity of extreme weather events increase further. Without adaptation, we will see more property, infrastructure and agriculture damaged or destroyed, with devastating consequences to households, communities and businesses – as well as increasing risks to economic and financial stability. To date there has been relatively more focus on mitigation and the transition to net zero than on adaptation and addressing physical risk, across both government and the private sector. Adaptation is mitigation’s sidekick, we need them to consistently work together to achieve better outcomes. Much like Batman and Robin.

Continue reading →

Weathering the storm: the economic impact of floods and the role of adaptation

Rebecca Mari and Matteo Ficarra.

Floods are the most costly natural disaster in Europe. In the UK, they account for around GBP1.4 billion in annual losses. Yet, evidence on the macroeconomic implications is inconclusive. GDP often shows a puzzling delayed response, and prices can be pushed in opposite directions. Using a novel county level data set for England for the years 1998–2021, we estimate the impact of flooding on output and inflation at the sector level. Sectors react heterogeneously to floods, which explains well aggregate evidence. Prices respond in sectors related to both headline and core inflation, which has crucial implications for monetary policy. We further show that investing in flood defences mitigates the economic burden of floods by strongly reducing the risk of flooding.

Continue reading →

Staying afloat: the impact of flooding on UK firms

Benjamin Crampton, Rupert-Hu Gilman and Rebecca Mari.

With climate change set to increase the frequency and intensity of flooding in the UK, it is important to deepen our understanding of the potential microeconomic impacts that may propagate into the macroeconomy. We integrate firm-level corporate records, with Ordnance Survey business-premise address information and publicly available flood maps to investigate two questions. First, what characteristics of firms are associated to the historical exposure and current risk of flooding; and second, what is the impact of flood events on corporate outcomes. We find significant sectoral, spatial and structural heterogeneity among firms in their risk and exposure to flooding. Larger firms are more likely to locate in flood zones, while small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and natural-resource-related industries have historically been impacted most heavily.

Continue reading →

The heterogenous effects of carbon pricing: macro and micro evidence

Ambrogio Cesa-Bianchi, Alex Haberis, Federico Di Pace and Brendan Berthold

To achieve the Paris Agreement objectives, governments around the world are introducing a range of climate change mitigation policies. Cap-and-trade schemes, such as the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS), which set limits on the emissions of greenhouse gases and allow their price to be determined by market forces, are an important part of the policy mix. In this post, we discuss the findings of our recent research into the impact of changes in carbon prices in the EU ETS on inflation and output, focusing on how the emissions intensity of output – the quantity of CO_² emissions per unit of GDP – affects the response. Understanding these economic impacts is important for the Bank’s core objectives for monetary and financial stability.

Continue reading →

Climate and monetary policy series

Boromeus Wanengkirtyo, Francesca Diluiso, Rebecca Mari, Jenny Chan, Ambrogio Cesa-Bianchi and Alex Haberis.

Climate change is becoming increasingly important for monetary policy as the world transitions into greener economies and climate change’s physical impacts become more prominent. This is complementary, but distinct to, examining how climate change affects financial stability risks (Carney (2015)). This series of posts highlights how climate change can affect key economic variables such as output and inflation, and thereby the conduct of monetary policy. Climate change and climate policies represent another set of economic shocks and structural changes to monitor, so that monetary policy can meet its objectives.

Continue reading →

Some implications of climate policy for monetary policy

Francesca Diluiso, Boromeus Wanengkirtyo and Jenny Chan.

This post examines key aspects of climate mitigation policies that could matter for monetary policy, using insights from structural climate macroeconomic models (Environmental Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium). Three main findings emerge: first, mitigation policies – like carbon pricing – can be a direct source of shocks, creating potential trade-offs for monetary policy (Carney (2017)). Second, the degree to which these policies are anticipated affects their macroeconomic impacts. Third, different climate policies may alter the transmission of conventional business-cycle shocks, therefore affecting the calibration of optimal monetary policy. We focus on the 3–5 year horizon, abstracting from longer-run considerations and changing trends such as interactions with the zero lower bound, the natural interest rate, or transitional effects on productivity and output.

Continue reading →

International spillovers from climate policy

Francesca Diluiso and Aydan Dogan

To achieve the emissions reduction targets outlined in The Paris Agreement, many economies have started implementing various types of climate policies. These policies, which include subsidies for green production or investment, carbon taxes, and cap and trade schemes, are crucial for guiding the transition to a greener economy. However, by altering the cost and the emission intensity of domestically produced goods, they may have an impact on inflation, output, and international trade flows. This blog post explores the spillover effects due to the implementation of climate policy in a single country. We examine two major types of policies currently implemented and discussed worldwide: green subsidies and carbon taxes.

Continue reading →

Beyond emissions: the interplay of macroprudential regulation and climate policy

Francesca Diluiso, Barbara Annicchiarico and Marco Carli

While climate change is often seen as a long-term concern, climate mitigation policies can have different short-term effects, since they affect the transmission mechanism of conventional macroeconomic shocks. In a new working paper, we show that cap-and-trade schemes lead to lower volatility in GDP and financial variables, and result in reduced welfare costs of the business cycle, when compared to the more widely known carbon taxes. As we find that these welfare differences are primarily driven by distortions in financial markets, we argue that countercyclical macroprudential regulation, even without any green-biased component, can effectively align the welfare performance of these policies and mitigate their short-run costs.

Continue reading →