The heterogenous effects of carbon pricing: macro and micro evidence

Ambrogio Cesa-Bianchi, Alex Haberis, Federico Di Pace and Brendan Berthold

To achieve the Paris Agreement objectives, governments around the world are introducing a range of climate change mitigation policies. Cap-and-trade schemes, such as the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS), which set limits on the emissions of greenhouse gases and allow their price to be determined by market forces, are an important part of the policy mix. In this post, we discuss the findings of our recent research into the impact of changes in carbon prices in the EU ETS on inflation and output, focusing on how the emissions intensity of output – the quantity of CO2 emissions per unit of GDP – affects the response. Understanding these economic impacts is important for the Bank’s core objectives for monetary and financial stability.

Continue reading “The heterogenous effects of carbon pricing: macro and micro evidence”

When bigger isn’t better: UK firms’ equity price performance during the Covid-19 pandemic

Tommaso Aquilante, David Bholat, Andreas Joseph, Riccardo M Masolo, Tim Munday and David van Dijcke

Background

Covid-19 (Covid) has had heterogeneous effects on different groups of people. For example, it’s had larger negative impacts on contact-intense occupations (Leibovici, Santacreu and Famiglietti (2020)), low wage earners (Joyce and Xu (2020)) and low-income households (Surico, Känzig and Hacioglu (2020) and Chetty et al (2020)). In this blog, we show that UK listed firms have been heterogeneously impacted too (compare Hassan et al (2020); Griffith, Levell and Stroud (2020)). Surprisingly, small firms’ stock prices have been more resilient on average. Or, to put it differently, being bigger hasn’t been better for firms during the pandemic. However, being big with a modern tilt towards intangibles turned out to be beneficial too.

Continue reading “When bigger isn’t better: UK firms’ equity price performance during the Covid-19 pandemic”