Retail investors’ participation in the gilt market

Sarah Munson and Callum Ashworth

In recent years, retail investors’ demand for UK government bonds (gilts) has increased, marking a change in the composition of market participants. The growth of retail investors, comprised of individuals managing their own portfolios, has been a global phenomenon (Foxall et al (2025)). But what’s driving this change, and what does it mean for the gilt market’s role in monetary policy and financial stability? In this post we explore how UK-based retail participants’ presence in the gilt market is changing and what that might signal for the future. We find that retail holdings of gilts remain modest, with positions concentrated in a handful of bonds. This has limited impact on aggregate liquidity indicators but can impact liquidity in these specific bonds.

Continue reading →

How does lower inflation uncertainty affect households’ financial behaviour?

Christoph Herler and Philip Schnattinger

Macroeconomic Environment Theme

The Bank of England Agenda for Research (BEAR) sets the key areas for new research at the Bank over the coming years. This post is an example of issues considered under the Macroeconomic Environment Theme which focuses on the changing infaton dynamics and unfolding structural change faced by monetary policy makers

The recent inflation surge has sparked concerns about how uncertainty over price dynamics shapes households’ financial behaviour. Often, lower uncertainty about inflation coincides with lower expected inflation – when inflation is low and stable, households feel more confident about future trends. In a new paper, Johannes J. Fischer, Christoph Herler and Philip Schnattinger employ a randomised controlled trial (RCT) to disentangle the effects of households’ uncertainty about inflation from the expected level. This disentangling is important: lower expected inflation can discourage immediate spending, while lower inflation uncertainty may push them towards spending more. We show that reduced inflation uncertainty leads to higher planned spending, lower saving rates, and a shift towards liquid assets with fixed returns.

Continue reading →

GIV us some credit: estimating the macroeconomic effects of credit supply shocks

Sam Christie and Aniruddha Rajan

Sudden contractions in credit supply can trigger and amplify recessions – a reality made painfully clear by the 2008 global financial crisis (GFC). However, quantifying these real economic effects is challenging. In this post, we demonstrate a novel way to do so using Granular Instrumental Variables (GIV), focusing on the UK mortgage market. The core idea is that we can exploit the market’s concentration to build up exogenous fluctuations in aggregate credit supply from idiosyncratic lender-specific shocks. Using our GIV, we find evidence that contractionary mortgage supply shocks can have quantitatively significant effects on the macroeconomy, causing persistent decreases in output, consumption, and investment, alongside increases in unemployment.

Continue reading →

Fossicking in the dark or twenty-twenty foresight?

Rishi Khiroya and Lydia Henning

If you asked people what skill they would most love to have, you might receive answers like ‘to fly’, ‘to be invisible’ or even ‘predicting the future’. If you asked people who worked in financial markets in particular, ‘accurately predicting the future’ would probably be top of the list. From economic trends to political shifts, market participants have a stake in anticipating what comes next. We use data collected from the Bank’s Market Participants Survey (MaPS) to see how market predictions have tended to compare with what subsequently unfolds over the period of high uncertainty and volatility that has been observed in the wake of the pandemic – and how predictive accuracy has varied depending on the time horizon in question.

Continue reading →

The Bank of England’s statutory monetary policy objectives: a historical and legal account

Michael Salib and Mesha Ghazaleh

The Bank’s monetary policy objectives are some of the most significant objectives bestowed by Parliament on any UK public authority. They are to maintain price stability and, subject to that, support the Government’s economic policy, including its objectives for growth and employment. In our paper we offer a historical and legal account of the Bank’s monetary policy objectives by looking at their origins, the parliamentary debates around their wording and their interpretation in practice. Since being introduced in 1998, our paper finds that they have proved remarkably resilient in directing the Bank’s monetary response over the past 25 years, partly due to the in-built flexibility in their wording.

Continue reading →

Stable gilts and stable prices: assessing the Bank of England’s response to the LDI crisis

Nicolò Bandera and Jacob Stevens

How should the central bank conduct asset purchases to restore market functioning without causing higher inflation? The Bank of England was faced with this question during the 2022 gilt crisis, when it undertook gilt purchases on financial stability grounds while inflation was above 10%. These financial stability asset purchases could have counteracted the monetary policy stance by easing financial conditions at a time when monetary policy was tightening them. Did a trade-off between price and financial stability arise? In our Staff Working Paper, we find the asset purchases stabilised gilt markets without materially affecting the monetary policy stance. This was only possible because the intervention was temporary; highly persistent asset purchases would have created tension between price and financial stability.

Continue reading →

Climate and monetary policy series

Boromeus Wanengkirtyo, Francesca Diluiso, Rebecca Mari, Jenny Chan, Ambrogio Cesa-Bianchi and Alex Haberis.

Climate change is becoming increasingly important for monetary policy as the world transitions into greener economies and climate change’s physical impacts become more prominent. This is complementary, but distinct to, examining how climate change affects financial stability risks (Carney (2015)). This series of posts highlights how climate change can affect key economic variables such as output and inflation, and thereby the conduct of monetary policy. Climate change and climate policies represent another set of economic shocks and structural changes to monitor, so that monetary policy can meet its objectives.

Continue reading →

Some implications of climate policy for monetary policy

Francesca Diluiso, Boromeus Wanengkirtyo and Jenny Chan.

This post examines key aspects of climate mitigation policies that could matter for monetary policy, using insights from structural climate macroeconomic models (Environmental Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium). Three main findings emerge: first, mitigation policies – like carbon pricing – can be a direct source of shocks, creating potential trade-offs for monetary policy (Carney (2017)). Second, the degree to which these policies are anticipated affects their macroeconomic impacts. Third, different climate policies may alter the transmission of conventional business-cycle shocks, therefore affecting the calibration of optimal monetary policy. We focus on the 3–5 year horizon, abstracting from longer-run considerations and changing trends such as interactions with the zero lower bound, the natural interest rate, or transitional effects on productivity and output.

Continue reading →

Nonbank lenders as global shock absorbers

David Elliott, Ralf Meisenzahl and José-Luis Peydró

Capital flows and credit growth are strongly correlated across countries. Macroeconomic evidence suggests that this ‘global financial cycle’ is largely driven by US monetary policy: expansionary policy by the Federal Reserve drives increases in lending globally, while contractionary Fed policy leads to a tightening of global financial conditions. Existing academic literature emphasises the role of banks in propagating these US monetary policy spillovers. But in recent decades, nonbank financial intermediaries have grown in importance. In a recent paper, we investigate the impact of US monetary policy on international dollar lending by nonbanks relative to banks, and show that nonbank lenders play an important role in absorbing US monetary policy shocks.

Continue reading →

High hurdles: evidence on corporate investment hurdle rates in the UK

Krishan Shah, Phil Bunn and Marko Melolinna

An important way in which monetary policy impacts the economy is through its effects on the capital expenditure of firms. When policy rates are raised (and as long as risk-premia remain unchanged) firms’ cost of capital increases. A higher cost of capital should lead firms to increase their required return (or hurdle rate) on investment, resulting in fewer projects exceeding the hurdle rate and less investment overall. For monetary policy to impact investment, changes in the cost of capital need to pass through to hurdle rates. Using new survey evidence, we find that hurdle rates for UK firms tend to be high, and they have responded sluggishly to higher interest rates over the past two years.

Continue reading →